Learning with Gill
  • Stir It Up
  • Blog
  • Class It Up
  • Flip it Up
  • Stir It Extra

Stir It Up - Blogging With Gill

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards."

Soren Kierkegaard

The SAMR Model

Creating The Schools Our Children Need. A Book Review

8/22/2018

1 Comment

 

“Everything works somewhere and nothing works everywhere” according to Dr. Dylan Wiliam, who is a formative assessment authority, in his 2018 book: Creating The Schools Our Children Need. In the first half of the book, Dr. Wiliam challenges the effectiveness of popular educational reforms and concludes that they “do not work enough”. The educational reforms that are reviewed include; getting smarter teachers, firing bad teachers, paying teachers more, reducing class size, expanding school choice, and copying other countries. In the final section of the book, Dr. Wiliam provides practical and research-informed recommendations for school systems and teachers to cost-effectively improve student educational achievement. Dr. Wiliam recommends school systems provide a knowledge-rich curriculum, focus teacher professional development on short and long cycle formative assessment, and create a school climate where all teachers work collaboratively to improve their practices.

The discussion in the first section of the book on reducing class sizes sparked my interest, especially in light of the recent Canadian Supreme Court decision where British Columbia class sizes were reduced by nearly half. The most widely cited example of the benefits of reducing class sizes was the ``Project STAR`` experiment in Tennessee with kindergarten students from 1985 to 1989. The results demonstrated that all students benefited, especially “minority students and those from less advantaged homes”. In 1996, California legislated a reduction of class sizes in the elementary grades from 30 to 20 students. The change benefited student achievement, but at half the level expected based on the Tennessee results. It turned out that the main reason for the less than expected results was that the overall level of teacher effectiveness in schools was reduced because California had trouble obtaining experienced teachers. Although Dr. Wiliam often mentions the costs, he may underplay the overall benefits to of having an educated citizenry (jobs, income, and wellness). In addition, Dr. Wiliam does not mention the benefits to students of having the option to select from a more diverse set of course options. Reducing class sizes also allows teachers to have more time to provide additional individualized learning opportunities, interventions, and formative feedback. Lower class sizes would also reduce teacher workload and free up time to be used for formative assessment activities, class preparation, assessment for learning, professional development, and collaboration with peers.

In the second half of the book, Dr. Wiliam recommends that teachers become `critical consumers` of educational research and stop looking for the next best thing, but rather focus on what we know works. Based on his research on “how our brains works”, Dr. Wiliam argues that teachers should provide students with a "Knowledge-Rich Curriculum”. Dr. Wiliam explains that because of short-term memory limitations our brains need information in our long-term memory to think deeply and understand the relationship and connection between different aspects of knowledge. Dr. William recommends that curriculum should be carefully structured and sequenced to build knowledge and that students must be provided with regular opportunities for self-testing. Because students’ short-term memory can be easily overwhelmed trying to transfer information into long-term memory (cognitive load theory), Dr. Wiliam recommends that teachers should introduce elements of a complex task one by one. Teachers should take students through each step of a problem and provide background knowledge versus having students try to solve problems completely on their own. Dr. William also recommends that it is better to space out studying (distributed practice) and to engage in practice testing, which makes it easier to recall concepts in long-term memory.

Dr. Wiliam states that the greatest practical impact to improve student achievement is to invest in teacher professional development with attention on formative assessment. Teachers must provide feedback to students on the things a student cannot yet do (deliberate practice). Ericsson’s study on expert violinists suggests that their practice is more often focused on things they are not yet good at, not just simple repetition. The 2015 PISA survey on science literacy indicated that the two main factors associated with student success were affluence (socio-economics) and teachers’ ability to adapt to students’ individual needs. The third factor was the amount of teacher-directed instruction. Dr. Wiliam proposes that good instruction starts from where students are at, which requires effective assessment strategies during instruction, so that teachers and students can make appropriate adjustments. Key features of this type of “short-cycle” formative assessment include:
1) Ensuring students know what they are supposed to be learning.
2) Finding out what students are learning.
3) Provide feedback that improves learning.
4) Having students provide peer feedback and support.
5) Developing students’ ability to self-monitor progress.

​Dr. Wiliam concludes that the first step to school improvement is to focus on developing a school climate where all teachers “need to get better, not because they are not good enough, but because they can be even better”. Not only must teachers and school leaders “press for student achievement”, but we must also promote a school culture of mutual trust and focus on improving teacher professional development.


1 Comment

Learner Centered Innovation Book Reflection

8/6/2018

0 Comments

 
Building a vibrant and authentic "Learning Culture" in schools for students and teachers is a complex task. The book: Learning Centered Innovation by Katie Martin, was recommended by my colleague Tina Zita, an Instructional Technology Resource Teacher at the Peel District School Board, to learn about our school board's "Empowering Modern Learner" vision and system initiative. In addition to providing many practical strategies for teachers to "empower" students in our individual classes, the author includes a system-wide and "learning organization" analysis approach to develop recommendations that also highlight the necessity to “empower" teachers if we want an authentic "culture of learning and innovation”. 

To support the argument for a more student-led and inquiry-focused model of learning to motivate students to be lifelong learners ready for the challenges of the 21st century, the author references many popular educational and business thinkers currently influencing Ontario educators and our school boards. Educators include George Couros, Will Richardson, John Spencer, A.J. Juliani, John Hattie, Carol Dweck, Dr. Yong Zhao, Dylan Wiliam, Jennifer Gonzales, and Michael Fullan. Business thinkers include Simon Sinek, Seth Godin, Steven Covey, Peter Drucker, Dan Pink, and Peter Senge. Although some readers might take issue with the frequent reference to business writers and private U.S. Charter Schools, such as High Tech High, the author’s organizational systems analysis approach highlights many system wide contradictions and the "knowing-doing gap" (P.7) related to empowering teachers, creating a collaborative school culture, and providing meaningful professional development. 

The key instructional and assessment strategies and philosophy encouraged throughout the book include project and inquiry-based learning, knowing the learner, 21st century competencies, personalized learning, feedback, and creating a shared understanding of learning goals. Some practical ideas that might benefit or appeal to classroom teachers include: 1) Co-creation of class rules and norms. 2) Evaluation of information from on-line resources. 3) Developing Student Interests and Strengths Inventories (See P. 188, 216, and 313). 4) Explicitly teaching communication and feedback (giving and receiving) skills. 5) Re-framing problems or approaches to solving problems.

Most interestingly, the author provides a clear critique and recommendations related to the larger school system challenges to empowering teachers, as well as students, and to improve overall school cultures. In chapter 4, there is a discussion related to disconnects, or the contradicting reality, related to school boards messaging and vision and teacher buy-in or development of a shared understanding. Students and teachers want to be empowered, but opportunities for autonomy, such as choice and voice, are sometimes limited. In Chapter 8, there is a discussion about the importance of coaching and relationships for staff development and a recommendation to "move beyond one-size-fits-all" training and development. There is a need to change from a culture of compliance to innovation, which applies as much to teachers as students. The author suggests administrators have to go beyond an "open door policy" and actively seek out and connect with staff. In Chapter 9, which is aptly titled "Teachers create what they experience", there is a critique on traditional professional development, which is often designed by someone outside of the school, delivered as an "isolated event", and expected to be implemented even without sufficient understanding or buy-in. The author reminds us that choice and voice and providing authentic experiences to engage are equally important for staff and student learning. Teachers may benefit from personalized learning similar to what is proposed for students. Finally, in Chapter 10, there is a discussion on creating professional learning communities and a culture of psychological safety and structure to promote collaborative learning for teachers. 

The key "takeaway" from the book: Learning Centered Innovation is that creating an authentic school culture or “Learning Organization”, as described by the author and Peter Senge, requires a school culture of "R-E-S-P-E-C-T." and authentic collaboration among students and teachers.
0 Comments

ResearchEd Ontario Conference, April 2018

6/19/2018

0 Comments

 
In the fall of 2016, the OSSTF provincial executive asked members for input for the 2016/17 Annual Action Plan of the Annual Meeting of the Provincial Assembly (AMPA). A proposal that highlighted the issue of members feeling overwhelmed by new and changing Ministry of Education and school board initiatives, who at the same time feel as though they have less say in professional development, followed. While members are encouraged to allow students to lead and personalize their learning, teachers often feel forced to listen to presentations on generic topics that are not of their own choosing and do not meet their unique professional development needs. At AMPA 2016/17, the Annual Action Plan included the sponsoring of the first ResearchEd Conference in Mississauga this past April.

ResearchEd’s motto is “Working Out What Works” and is a grass-roots, teacher-led organization focused on raising educators research literacy. At the ResearchEd Ontario conference, OSSTF members from across the province networked and participated in workshops that explored the research behind ‘what works’ in education. In the conference introduction by ResearchEd co-founder Tom Bennett, members were encouraged to think critically and ask “What is the research?” behind any new educational initiatives and reminded us of the caveat from Dylan Williams, “Everything works somewhere, nothing works everywhere.”. Although there was a healthy skepticism and general debunking of many “good sounding” educational fads or “urban legends”, the focus of the Conference and workshops was to share what has been proven to work in classrooms according to evidence-based research and cognitive science.

Some of the overarching educational “myths” that were challenged included the following assumptions: 1) that the new generation of learners are “digital natives” who are intuitively experts in technology, able to learn independently, and multitask; 2) that students are able to self-manage their learning, based on individual Learning Styles versus strategies related to cognitive abilities, prior knowledge, and subjects; 3) that content knowledge is not as important in the Internet age, where information is easily acquired; 4) that student-led learning replaces teacher-led learning.
 
In the keynote speech on the first day of the conference, Tom Bennett discussed the increasing challenges related to student behaviour and classroom management. There are often high levels of disturbances (noise and disorder) reported in classrooms around the world, especially when reported by classroom teachers. The result is that many students lose important instructional time because of disturbances or bad behaviour. According to the research summarized by Bennett, effective school cultures require decreased negative behaviour and increased positive behavior. To improve behavior, you have to get in front of the behavior by “building the environment”, or creating a positive class culture (beliefs and values) where students can “flourish”. You have also to be good at responding to the specific misbehaviour. Bennett reminds us that what children see is often more powerful than what you tell them. Do we accept students answering by just calling out? Do you walk by students who are misbehaving in the hall? The most effective classroom management strategies include creating standard class routines, positive social norms, constant behavioural feedback, and positive habits and character. Children must be clear about what is expected of them, and teachers need to help and scaffold that behaviour with them at all times.

There was also push-back from a number of speakers regarding the promotion of generic 21st Century Skills or Global Competencies and self-discovery learning as opposed to the direct instruction of subject content knowledge. Michael 17 Zwaagstra, a high school teacher from Manitoba and author, argues that teaching content and learning subject background knowledge is necessary for students to learn deeply and practice the Global Competencies such as Critical Thinking. He provided research to support his claims that teaching subject content knowledge is essential for reading comprehension, makes critical thinking possible, and empowers students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. He concludes that creative and critical thinking skills are not possible without background knowledge of the subject at hand and that these skills are not easily transferred between disciplines.

Dr Eva Hartell, a STEM classroom teacher from Sweden with a PhD in classroom assessment, shared her research on formative assessment using comparative judgment as a methodology to develop language to describe and understand what is “good work”. Comparative judgment is the process of repeatedly making judgments between pieces of work until a rank order has been established. The process includes teachers or students sharing and articulating the reason behind their ranking. Her research suggested that teachers often have difficulty explaining and student have difficulty understanding the learning criteria and expectations described in rubrics. Therefore, she recommends teachers provide students with examples of work to compare and judge to develop the self-efficacy to create good work.

Many conference speakers warned of over-corrections related to new educational paradigms and were skeptical when teachers are encouraged suddenly to reverse direction. Remembering the caveat from Dylan Wiliam, “Everything works somewhere, nothing works everywhere”, educators were encouraged to embrace an evidence-based research approach when adopting new instructional and assessment strategies and to collaborate, particularly on Twitter (@ researchED1), with other classroom teachers and educational researchers.
​
Here are some additional books and articles that were recommended by the various conference speakers:
  • Christodoulou, Daisy.  Making Good Progress (2017)
  • De Bruyckere, Pedro. The Ingredients for Great Teaching (2018)
  • Dunlosky, John. ‘Strengthening the Student Toolbox’ (2013)
  • Hattie, John, Visible Learning (2011)
  • Hirsch, Jr., E. D. Why Knowledge Matters (2016)
  • Kirschner & Merrienboer. ‘Do Learners Really Know Best?’ (2013)
  • Rosenshine, Barak. ‘Principles of Instruction’  (2012)
  • Nuthall  , Graham. The hidden lives of Learners (2007)
  • Schmoker,  Mike. Focus: Elevating the Essentials to Radically Improve Student Learning (2011)
  • Sweller, John, ‘Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning’, 1988
  • Wiliam, Dylan.  Creating the Schools Our Children Need, (2018)
  • Willingham, Daniel T.  The Reading Mind: A Cognitive Approach to Understanding How the Mind Reads (2017)
0 Comments

​Ten Lessons from ResearchEd 2018 Toronto Conference

4/16/2018

0 Comments

 
Here are my ten takeaways from the ResearchEd 2018 Toronto Conference based on attending the Friday Keynote by ResearchEd founder Tom Bennett, the Saturday Keynote by Professor Daniel Willingham, five workshops (Paul Bennett, Eva Hartell, Michael Zwaagstra, Eric Kalenze, and Tom Sherrington) and the closing Panel on the Future of Evidence Informed Education.

  1. Follow the backchannell conversation on Twitter  #rEDOnt
  2. Create a culture (consistent routines, norms, habits, high expectations, and behavioural feedback) in class and schools where all can flourish. @tombennett71
  3. Ask “do you have any evidence on why we should be doing that” the next time a new educational initiative or strategy is proposed to you. @tombennett71
  4. “Nothing works everywhere — Everything works somewhere” - @DTWillingham
  5. Keep on Reading. Here are a few recommendations from speakers. Barak Rosenshine paper ‘Principles of Instruction’, ‘Why Don’t Students Like School’ by Daniel T Willingham, ‘Creating the Schools Our Children Need’ by Dylan Wiliam, ‘The hidden lives of Learners’ by Graham Nuthall, ‘Cognitive Load Theory’ by John Sweller, ‘Focus: Elevating the Essentials to Radically Improve Student Learning’ by Mike Schmoker, Why Knowledge Matters by E. D. Hirsch, Jr., ‘Strengthening the Student Toolbox’ by John Dunlosky
  6. Watch out for stealth “Social and Emotional” assessment and data mining “a la” Cambridge Analytica! @Educhatter
  7. “Skills are likely to be best developed relative to some content” @ZwaagstraM
  8. “It’s best to know what you are looking for before you look for it” Winnie the Pooh. Be clear and provide learning intentions up front with your students. @EvaHartell
  9. “Growth mindset has to be pinned to effective strategy”. @teacherhead
  10. Watch out for over corrections (new paradigms and extreme actions in education) and get some hip-waders to help challenge new ideas that may not be evidence-based. @erickalenze
0 Comments

Special Education Specialist AQ

7/14/2017

0 Comments

 
Welcome back!

Why am I posting on my blog after more than a two year break?

This is a two part answer:
  1. I am taking an OISE summer Additional Qualifications Course: Special Education Specialist and the project for the online workshop I am developing is called Differentiated Assessment & Learning Via Blogging. Hence, I better start Posting again!
  2. My domain name expired and I never made the time to re-register and update my website. Busy with other stuff? Sure! Still teaching, still coaching, still a family man, sill learning, still volunteering, and trying to stay fit! Just not blogging, except micro-blogging on Twitter (@cgill2010).

Back to my summer PD and preparing for my Workshop Monday. Here is the Differentiated Assessment & Learning Via Blogging Workshop Flyer. 

Perhaps you can see it live at a conference some day such as the ASET 2018 Spring Conference , where am am 0/2 two in my recent workshop submissions. Keep trying!

​
0 Comments

Reflections from the #BIT14 Conference

11/8/2014

0 Comments

 
The following are some principles to think about based on  my  learning at the @BIT2014 Conference. 
  1. Build respect and trust with students. 
  2. Provide opportunities for students to create something of value.
  3. Allow students thinking space.
  4. Give students tinkering time.
  5. Share helpful advise and feedback.
  6. Model all forms of Citizenship.
  7. Use technology purposefully. 
  8. Collaborate with other teachers. 
  9. Keep trying new ideas and learn from the experience. 
  10. Encourage deep learning and reflection.
0 Comments

Integrating Technology with Project-Based Learning 

11/5/2014

0 Comments

 

Here is a copy of the PowerPoint Slides for my BIT2014 Conference presentation on Integrating Technology with Project Based Learning. The session is scheduled for Thursday, November 6 in room 101! 

Remember to Tweet to the conference #BIT14 and the session #BIT2014techpbl. 

Enjoy!
 

0 Comments

Tech and Project-Based Learning Influences

11/4/2014

0 Comments

 

The following are some of the educational and business thinkers mentioned in my presentation on "Leveraging Technology to Enhance Experiential Learning" at the BringIT, Together2 (BIT14) Confrence. The "Lanyrd" Presentation Summary is  http://lanyrd.com/2014/ecoo14/sddxxt/ 

1) Michael Fullan, 21st Century Learning Skills 
2) Henry Mintzberg, The Art, Science, and Craft of Management
3) Daniel Pink, A Whole New Mind
4) Howard Gardner, Five Minds of the Future
5) Ken Robinsen, The Element
6) Mark Prensky, Teaching Digital Natives
7) Mitch Joel, Six Pixels of Separation
8) Don Tapscott, Wikinomics
9) Mark Ribble, Digital Citizenship
10) Ruben R. Puentedura, The SAMR Model
11) Seymour Papert, Constructionism and Tinkering

0 Comments

Eight Student Ideas to Transform 21st Century Learning

9/25/2014

0 Comments

 

"Anyone in an environment that is not preparing him or her for a tougher future should move out fast”  John P. Kotter


Consider and comment on these eight "transformational change" ideas from my 2014 Grade 12 Business Leadership class. Their action-research project was to identify ideas  to make schools more innovative and to prepare students with 21st century learning skills  (Collaboration, Communication, Critical Thinking, Creativity):

1) Project Based Learning

2) Autonomy and freedom to select path to achieve goals

3) Learning from failure and "reinventing to get it right"

4) Creativity and "brain training" classes

5) Standard teacher web sites

6) Twitter conversations 

7) Class discussion time at the end of all classes

8) Later start times and longer breaks between classes






0 Comments

Eight Tips to use Twitter for project-based learning

8/17/2014

0 Comments

 
Using Twitter to enhance student learning is full of pitfalls, excitement, and learning opportunities.  

My first major school project where students used Twitter was with my Grade 12 Management class to organize and promote a Leadership and Technology Conference. The project was an experiential learning project to learn the art, science, and practice of management. Many of the ideas on how to use Twitter for the conference were learned in collaboration with fellow business teacher, @LadyFitzee.  

To begin, the class had to create a conference Twitter account (@stltconference) and a conference hashtag (#pcstlt). Students were then encouraged (explicit criteria on instructional rubric) to tweet promotional and educational information prior to and at the conference.  During the conference, we had a separate computer and screen display the Twitter conversation using  Tweetdeck. In conclusion, the Conference "story" was created using Storify. 

Like any class project, many things went awry, some things were great, and I would do many things differently the next time!  Here are eight ideas and tips that might be considered to improve the learning experience.
  1. Plan and schedule plenty class time to creating appropriate names and make sure you check suggested names on Twitter before publishing anything. 
  2. Ensure you clearly demonstrate and explain what curriculum content you want the students to Tweet and have a conversation about.  Practice with an initial mini project or activity. 
  3. Plan and spend time to ensure the class understands and buys into the concept of Digital Citizenship  (etiquette, literacy, and communications).
  4. Practice setting up and moderating conversations on Tweetdeck before going live!. You can block, or "mute", inappropriate users! 
  5. Create your own specific teacher account for the project or class. 
  6. Create temporary accounts for any student that is reluctant or not allowed to use Twitter or social Media. 
  7. Collaborate with other classes (your school and others) and community professionals.
  8. Have fun!
0 Comments
<<Previous
    Picture

    Author

    I am a Business and Learning Strategies teacher at Port Credit Secondary School. Member of OSSTF Branch Executive and Communications and Education Services Committees. I also coach Basketball and Badminton and support the Chess and Grade 9 Boys Club. 

    Prior to teaching, I volunteered with Rotary International, the YMCA, and local Boys clubs coaching basketball while working in Operations Management, Marketing, and Sales in Finance, Telecommunications, and Software companies. 

    Archives

    April 2018
    July 2017
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

    Categories

    All
    Authentic Learning
    Blended Learning
    Blogging
    Collaboration
    Communications
    Creativity
    Experiential Learning
    Flipped Classroom
    Innovation
    Project Based Learning
    Team Learning
    Twitter
    Wiki

    RSS Feed

    Tweets by @cgill2010
Proudly powered by Weebly